Is it true that the 15 biggest ships in the world produce more pollution than all the cars?

Large commercial vessels primarily burn what’s called Heavy Fuel Oil when out at sea. This fuel is not heavily refined, has high sulfur content and produces a lot of sulfur oxide and nitrogen oxide compounds when it is burned.

Cars burn a highly refined gasoline which produces almost no sulfur oxides or nitrogen oxides. Even trucks burn a highly refined highway diesel which must contain less than 15 parts per million of sulfur, so they too produce very few sulfur oxides and nitrogen oxides. Cars and trucks do produce quite a bit of carbon dioxide and other pollutants.

So yes, the 15 biggest ships produce more sulfur oxide pollutants than all the cars in the world, because they run on completely different fuels. A ship produces more carbon dioxide emission per mile and per gallon of fuel than a car. Ships in general, however, have the lowest emission levels of any other method of cargo transport , producing fewer emissions per ton of freight per mile than barges, trains or trucks.

To do a true comparison of ships and cars, the easiest method would be to look at a Pure Car and Truck Carrier, more affectionately known as a RO/RO (Roll On Roll Off). These ships carry thousands of cars to the U.S., Europe, Asia and elsewhere. A single RO/RO can carry an average of 8,000 cars, trucks and other equipment. Let’s take an average RO/RO shipping 8,000 cars from Hong Kong to Los Angeles. This is a distance of about 7,286 miles. We’ll use an average vehicle fuel economy for the cars of 25 miles per gallon, an average fuel economy of 42 Metric Tonnes per day and an average speed of 25 knots for the RO/RO. Using these rates it would take 2,331,520 gallons or 6507.3 Metric Tonnes of fuel to move those vehicles if you simply drove them (and this doesn’t include the cost and pollution created by 8,000 drivers). The RO/RO however only requires 510 Metric Tonnes of fuel to move all of those vehicles and itself from Hong Kong to Los Angeles. This means the ship only used 7.8% of the total fuel required by all those vehicles for the same distance. I’d say that’s a pretty good savings.

World’s Largest RO/RO Ship, M/V Tønsberg

Several years ago, regulations came into effect limiting the sulfur content of the fuel that commercial ships could burn within an area designated as an Emission Control Area to less then 1% sulfur. At the beginning of 2015, those regulations became even more strict and limited that sulfur content to less than 0.1% sulfur. The entirety of Europe and the United States and their waters out to 200 nautical miles were designated Emission Control Areas as well as several other areas around the world. This means before ships enter the Exclusive Economic Zone of the US or any European countries, they must switch from burning the Heavy Fuel Oil to burning an Ultra Low Sulfur Marine Gas Oil, which is very similar to highway diesel fuel.

Heavy Fuel Oil is very cheap compared to Ultra Low Sulfur Marine Gas Oil and many engines are not designed to handle the ULSMGO because it is so much thinner than HFO it does not have the lubrication properties of the HFO. Companies are using various workarounds to make it work, such as chilling the fuel to increase the viscosity or injecting extra lubricant into certain parts of the engine. Due to the extra costs and possible mechanical issues, these regulations are continuously reevaluated and phased approaches are used for implementation.

The International Maritime Organization, a division of the United Nations which oversees and regulates all international shipping, is continuously pushing commercial shipping to improve and creating stricter environmental laws. Plans are place to reduce the sulfur content allowed in fuels to below the levels required in Emission Control Areas just last year (2014), but this is years away because current technology would make that cost prohibitive for many shipping companies. Currently, sulfur content standards for fuel used in international shipping is set at no more than 3.5%. In 2020, that will drop to no more than 0.5%. All of these regulations are contained in the Convention on Marine Pollution (MARPOL), Annex VI, which sets the regulations for Air Pollution in the Maritime Industry.

Some companies are part of the push, however, and the first two container ships powered exclusively by Liquefied Natural Gas were just launched. These ships will produce fewer emissions, of any compound, than any other vessel currently in service. The entire shipping industry is looking at conversions to natural gas or other fuels, and engine manufacturers are designing engines that can handle a variety of fuels.

3 replies added

  1. Charles Swor March 14, 2018 Reply

    Hello, I am trying to find the source of the data for the statement you are making about the 15 largest ships. Neither your article nor any other article that makes this statement has any citations to back it up. Can you please direct me to the primary source of this data; i.e. measurements of the GHG emissions of the 15 (or 16) largest ships?

    FYI, I am a chemistry professor. I teach about climate change in some of my courses. I made this statement to my students the other day, but told them I wasn’t sure where I had heard it before, and that I wasn’t sure if it was actually true or not. I am trying to figure out whether or not it is true, before I tell anybody else.

    • Josiah March 21, 2018 Reply

      Well, I honestly don’t think there is an accurate source, because I highly doubt that the statement is true. It certainly seems to be popular, though, which is why I decided to use it as a discussion point. Due to the high sulfur content of heavy fuel oil compared to gasoline, ships produce sulfur dioxide which could be why some people believe it to be true. Again, however, this is only a guess. When looking at fuel burn rates between ships and cars, ships burn less fuel per ton per mile, so they are actually more fuel efficient than cars.

  2. Michael Allen June 13, 2018 Reply

    The original suppostion of x number of ships producing as much pollution as x number of cars started with this 2009 article from The Guardian:

    The article states, “Confidential data from maritime industry insiders based on engine size and the quality of fuel typically used by ships and cars shows that just 15 of the world’s biggest ships may now emit as much pollution as all the world’s 760m cars.”

    The comments are based on data and analysis by Dr. James Corbett, Associate Director, Marine Policy & Professor, University of Delaware.

    In 2017, the BBC produced a news audio recording which follows up on The Guardian’s 2009 story:

    In the audio, Dr. Corbett was asked about the pollution calculations. His explanation shows that his figures were based on certain assumptions and extrapolations. They were “a thought experiment” as part of a “simplistic calculation” to illustrate current and potential marine pollution. The interview goes on to point out changes which have been put into effect or planned since 2009.

    Some of his more recent work along with its associated data, which Dr. Corbett has jointly published with others, can be found here:

Leave your comment